Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Photo: James Cridland

A few days after the horrific shooting in Tucson this January, I saw President Obama speak at the national service for those affected by the disaster.  OK, so I watched him speak on a huge video screen in the stadium next to where he was actually speaking.  But I was there with about 20,000 other Tucsonans who wanted to be together, to honor and support their fellow community members, and frankly to see the President at what would most likely be his only visit to Tucson, ever.

He made a wonderful speech.  I was moved to share in the mourning, and to take hope and inspiration from the President’s words in the presence of my fellow Tucsonans, not to mention the millions of fellow Americans watching on TV.   As I recall, the speech was meant to call out the best in us: the service that the victims of the attack had given during their lifetimes, the bravery that some had shown under fire, and also the opportunity the tragedy presented our nation to undertake a more civil political discourse.  In many ways, President Obama was able to put into eloquent words what many of us were already thinking and feeling.

The event of the shootings was grave enough, and the service inspiring enough, that people took notice.  Soon Republicans and Democrats were literally holding hands as they took their seats in Congress, sitting next to each other in a show of national unity and a commitment to civility.

Though we’re now long past the hand-holding stage, the amazing thing is that the discourse has remained a bit more civil in Washington.  This is amazing because, in the Information Age, a teensy tiny bit of change is the absolute most one can hope for from one single large event.  We are exposed to so many diverse streams of information from so many places that one book, one speech, even one natural disaster can only have so much effect on people’s consciousness and behavior.

Gone are the days when a single book like Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring could spark an entire environmental movement, when a space race could galvanize a countrywide wave of nationalistic pride, or when a single figure like Gandhi could lead a movement of profound national­­–or global–change.  The Tucson shootings and our nation’s response to them may have created a tiny ripple of change, but it was virtually impossible that they–or any single event–could create a “turning point” in the political debate or at any large cultural scale.

Paradoxically, even as power and wealth concentrate in fewer and fewer hands, a great democratization is occurring primarily through the internet and social media.  As the world-rocking change in the Middle East illustrates, people’s ability to connect to each other more quickly and consistently is making autocracy a more tenuous position to maintain.  However, it also means that it is harder (or impossible) for any one leader–no matter how charismatic or enlightened–to effect massive change on their own.  In 2008, many hoped that Obama could provide that leadership on the level of legends like Lincoln and Martin Luther King.  In 2011, it’s apparent that a new type of leadership is necessary if we are to emerge from stalemate and chaos.

The challenge before us now is: how do we lead, how do we participate consciously in a world where access to both information and the pulpit is increasingly open to the many?  How do we lead (as a politician or a citizen) a government in deadlock, when even the most profound human tragedy–and opportunity–holds our attention for but a few days?

Step one in participating in this global shift from top-down “command and control” (think strong central government, massive centralized infrastructure etc.) to the “wisdom of the hive” (think distributed: political power, energy generation, food systems) is recognizing our own potential for empowerment.  Even though we hear stories every day of “average” people rocketed to fame and fortune through viral videos, most of us do not realize the enormous power and opportunity the Internet has plopped at our feet. This power shouldn’t just be used for making videos of our lip-syncing exploits, sharing the antics of our cats, or marketing our amusing doo-dads.  If you are one of the relatively few, blessed people on this planet who has the means, time and energy to read a blog post (especially one this long!), you have a responsibility to own this power, and use it­–for wisdom, beauty, compassion, and goodness.

Death by Taxes

photo: laverru

My wife and I finished our taxes this week.  We got married in 2010, and received a several hundred dollar tax penalty.  Awesome.  Whether you are writing a check to Uncle Sam this April, or receiving a “refund” (an interest-free loan you provided to the government), taxes suck.  As the saying goes, they are one of the few things in life we can reliably count on.

Taxes suck on one level because it can be difficult to see their tangible benefit.  Sure, they pay for the highways we drive on, but they also go to things like (here in Arizona) an agency whose sole job is to try to get people to film movies in our state (our state legislators are also busy at work passing important legislation like liberalizing gun laws, requiring birth certificates for Presidential candidates, and generally outlawing brownness–but I digress).  Oh, yeah, and 54% of your and my federal taxes go directly to the military.

For the thinking, feeling person, tax season is a time of reckoning.  It is a time to acknowledge responsibility–yes, we are paying for the killing of human beings, among other things.  It is also a time for another reality check: whether we like it or not, we are part of a nation.

Many of us do various practices to connect with something bigger than ourselves (the “community”, Spirit, whatever), while ignoring (or at least holding at arm’s length) the often inconvenient fact that we are citizens of a country.  We may be “global citizens” or islands of self-determination in our own minds, but we (Americans) are also part of a big, honking, military-industrial, Tea Party-to-Ralph Nader nation.  As citizens of that nation, we have a responsibility to own our part in it.

Taking the responsibility of citizenship seriously doesn’t have to look like writing your Senator futile letters or sending care packages to the troops.  I have a friend who for years has been a war tax resister, which means that he has refused to support war with his money by not paying taxes.  He has taken that money and donated it instead to what he sees as good causes, like local charities and international peace organizations. I greatly admire the personal sacrifice he has made to live in integrity with his values (that is, he’s not been able to have any assets or credit, as they are subject to seizure by the government).  Whether or not we see this particular strategy as useful, imagine what the country might be like if we all put this much conscious consideration into our roles as American citizens.

This Tax Day, may we take a moment to contemplate our part in the national “we.”  May we remember that civic responsibility is not something we assume, it is something we inherently have.  Whether as resisters, activists, participants, abstainers, or complainers, we are always creating a nation that has very real effects in people’s lives, here and around the world.  Amid our “media diets,” political disgust, and sense of helplessness as but one individual in a country of 300 million, may we transcend our limited self-senses to contribute to something larger than ourselves.

photo: monsieurlam

Want to teach a great class, give an affecting presentation, make transcendent art, or just show up more fully in your life?  Listen to Eminem’s song “I Need a Doctor.”

The song is technically Dr. Dre’s (Eminem raps the first two verses and Dre the final one), but that’s just the point: Eminem owns this track.  When I first heard it, the contrast between Eminem’s energized performance and Dr. Dre’s listless one was so stark that I realized why Eminem is so appealing to so many people: the man has perfected the art of the 3-body performance.  That is, he raps from a thorough and simultaneous engagement of his physical, subtle, and causal bodies.

A little background: Dr. Dre “discovered” Eminem, put him on the map, and produced his most recent album.  Though Dre has had his own successful career as a rapper and producer, he has faced some life challenges recently and you get the sense that he (or the public) feels he is in drift and decline.  In “I Need a Doctor,” Eminem gives thanks to his mentor, and challenges his friend to rise up and kick ass again.

Back to the 3-body analysis:

Physical: First, Eminem is from somewhere.  He has roots, and he owns them.  Did you see his Super Bowl commercial for Chrysler?  In it, he is able to reveal the dignity, power, and promise of a city best known for its terrible decline–his hometown Detroit­.  These roots feed the power of his music and his persona, as they do for many rappers. To get where you want to go, you’ve got to know–and trust–where you’ve come from.

More immediately, the man lives in his body–at least while he’s performing.  This comes out in the “oomph” of his words; and it’s an important lesson for anybody who speaks or performs in public and wants to make an impact: power comes from your legs, pelvis, belly and lower chest (lower three chakras)–not just from your tender heart, brilliant mind or transcendent spirit.

Subtle: The subtle body is the realm found in each of us made up of emotions, thoughts, inner sensations, impulses and drives.  It is the body of prana or life energy, and Eminem’s music courses with it.  In “I Need a Doctor” his words pulse with raw, authentic emotion as he states his love and gratitude for Dr. Dre. You can feel that he knows just what he owes this man, and is unwilling to let him drown in the shit he’s been swimming in.  He goads, implores Dre to stop staring at his navel and to rise again to greatness, to wake up and fight.  More than once I have felt tears well in my eyes at the fierce love behind these words.

Not just behind, but beyond the words is the rapper’s sheer energy: the rhythm and tone of his voice conveys an exasperated, hopeful urgency that conjures an image of a boxing trainer screaming over the ropes at his fallen, beloved protégé.

Engaging this level of energy creates charisma, impact, and power.   Many yogis and spiritual practitioners do this by enacting inspired attitudes in their practice (a powerful method taught in Anusara Yoga) or dedicating their practice to the good of others.  Often when I’m about to give a presentation on an environmental topic I’ll take a moment to remember why I’m up there—because I care about nature, about people, about life.  That is, the subtle body can be energized by remembering that we give a shit.  Eminem’s method involves turning everything into a life-or-death struggle, and this is where the next level comes in:

Causal: Eminem reaches his greatest heights as an artist when his words are so strong, and the energy beneath them so powerful, that you know he’s giving everything he’s got.  There is no holding back, no saving face, and whenever anybody does this onstage or off, the moment opens up.  Transcendence, compassion, and understanding become possible when you give everything of yourself.  In moments of “I Need a Doctor” Eminem does this, and in so doing invites us into an expansive experience of the Heart.

In the last verse of the track, After Eminem’s firestorm of fierce gratitude and ferocious support, it appears that Dr. Dre is still laying down.  In comparison with Eminem, Dre’s voice is listless, tired and aimless.  It’s unfortunate, but this contrast, too, serves a function, making the lessons stand out in starker relief.

Photo: Helico

I had an intense week–after my last post had languished on the internet for a week with a couple hundred readers, all of a sudden several thousand showed up.  While most people would see this as a good thing, my mind used it as fuel for anxiety (what would I write next?  What are all these yogis going to think next time I write some wonky post about urban forestry?).  There was controversy that required clean-up (the note added to the post‘s first paragraph says it all).  I had submitted the piece to elephant journal in hopes that it would be the first post in an ongoing blog, and was wringing my hands about that.  My wife and I had just decided that we were going to buy a house, and were hectically driving around Tucson looking at the hideous properties in our price range.  I was traveling for work and preparing to present at a conference.  My stomach was acting up, allowing me to eat all of about three flavorless foods.  My hips ached.  I had reached the limit of intensity–of feeling, physical sensation, and anxious thinking–that I thought I could handle, and wanted to blow off steam.  So what did I do?  Bought a pack of cigarettes and smoked one.

Disgusting.  Didn’t help in the slightest.  Why did I do it?  Because underneath it all, I associate intensity with the sense that “something’s wrong.”  Therefore, I must avoid the sense of wrongness with tv, wine, food, smokes, magazines, exercise, gossip, whatever.  In the process, I completely contradict what I understand my life to be about: saying “Yes!” to what is and jumping wholeheartedly into the fray.

Many of us even have a hard time staying put in positive experiences of intensity.  I am reminded of delicious afternoons in yoga workshops where everyone is feeling warmed-up, buzzing with energy and we’ve made it to a pleasant series of supine poses.  In each stretch, the tendency is to groan with a satisfied “ahhhhhh…” as the muscles open and tingle with pleasure.  So it strikes me when my teacher (John Friend) points out that “blowing off steam” with the oohs and aahs of ecstasy can be a way of unconsciously discharging–and thus wasting–the subtle energy that we’ve just spent a day or more building through our practice.

The practice of consciously holding intensity is what the late, great Lee Lozowick called cathexis.  Catharsis (where energy or emotions are discharged or released) can certainly be healthy, but the deeper transformation that so many of us seek (personal, professional, social, or spiritual) requires that we learn how to build, hold, and skillfully use energy–and energy is intense.

Life is intense (dude), and all you have to do is open a newspaper to understand that  a deep transformation is being called from each of us and from all of us.  Does this mean that we must transcend all our human tendencies like the occasional glass of wine and Grey’s Anatomy?  I sure hope not.  Does it mean that next time things get intense, I might choose instead to take a deep breath and feel inside for something higher?  Absolutely.

Photo of yours truly by Ross Evans.

In my early yoga days studying Anusara Yoga with John Friend, he once told me (through my girlfriend) that I could be a great yogi like my friend Darren Rhodes.  To me, this meant that I too would be able to contort my body into incredible formations, and demonstrate my world-class athletic prowess through the art of Hatha Yoga.  (Note 3.7.2011): this does NOT mean that John encouraged me to contort my body or pursue a yoga that was externally focused in any way.  What I know now (and that I should have made clear when I first wrote this), is that John was referring to my studentship or adhikara, not to my athletic abilities.  This post is about my own challenges and misunderstandings about the teachings of yoga, and is not meant at all to be a commentary on John Friend or Anusara Yoga.  -JM)

I did have a lot of potential.  I was one of those guys who could do backbends so deep it looked (and felt) like a rainbow was going to explode out of my chest.  I was gung-ho, and loved the blissful energy that I tapped into through yoga.  I especially loved the attention­ that came through the demonstrations we’d do at every workshop.  “Going deeper” to me meant finally grabbing my foot in Natarajasana, taking Vishvamitrasana to its full extension, and flying higher on the fumes of Grace generated by intense practice and the guidance of one of yoga’s most charismatic and powerful teachers.

But Grace had other plans for me.  Over the course of a few years, I had increasing problems with pain in one of my hips.  Everybody thought it was a tight psoas muscle (deep hip flexor).  So I stretched my psoas more than any one person should do, with the trust that if I just followed the principles of physical alignment everything would heal.  Unfortunately the pain only increased–after every practice a nervy burning sensation would radiate through my pelvis.   Despite superhuman stretching efforts, massage, Rolfing, physical therapy, prayer, many yoga therapy consultations and a lot of worrying, the pain persisted and got worse.

I began to lose function.  At yoga workshops, as 100 other yogis pushed up into Urdhva Dhanurasana (full backbend), I held a gentle bridge pose with a block between my thighs.  I lost the ability to hike and bike, and sitting in any position became very painful.  I attended a Zen retreat and, because of the pain, did walking meditation alone outside while everyone else sat in the zendo.  At the ripe old age of 30, I had blown out my body in a pursuit that was supposed to be healing and balancing.

What was most painful about the situation was this: my mind was so strong in its image of what my practice should be like, and my emotions so raw in their need for external approval, that I missed what my body was saying: stop!  Stop pushing so hard.  Stop trying to live up to somebody else’s (i.e. Darren’s and other great yogis’) potential.  Stop mistaking the external form of the practice for the practice’s real meaning and purpose.

A moment of revelation came when in my search for answers, I stumbled upon a DVD on yoga anatomy.  My “a-ha” moment came when the teacher illustrated how bones are shaped differently from one person to the next, and how the shape of their bones can limit their ability to go deeper in certain poses–particularly in the hips and shoulders.  I felt a tinge of recognition as he showed how bone-on-bone impingements between the femur and pelvis could reduce range of motion and make certain poses impossible or highly restricted.  My eyes misted over as I thought ruefully of how many times I had pushed through just this situation, and encouraged my yoga students to do the same.

Three orthopedic surgeons later, I found out that that’s exactly what my situation was–I had “femoroacetabular impingement,” a condition in which the neck of the femur contacts the rim of the acetabulum in deep flexion and internal rotation (a.k.a. yoga).  The result was a torn labrum (a ring of connective tissue) in both hips.  I went on to get surgeries that would re-shape my bones, repair the labrum, and return both hips to full function.

After the surgery, I told my surgeon that I’d send him a photo of myself doing Natarajasana some day.  But almost three years later, I still haven’t gone back to that level of practice.   The practice I do now is very internal and mild, not because I can’t practice at that level of intensity, but because I don’t want to.  The yogic fire that I fed so intently has burned out, and now simmers as a pile of barely-warm coals.

Mine is a cautionary tale about the dangers of yoga’s appropriation by the ego.  I pursued greatness in ways that didn’t make sense for my own limitations and potential.  I also, like many, many people I know, made a crucial error in my understanding of what yoga is.  Yoga is not meant to be a competitive sport, or an artistic form like ballet where the body is mortified to create an image of beauty.  One cannot “win” in yoga, nor does “going deeper” in a pose necessarily mean stretching it further or holding it longer.  Yoga is a powerful form of subtle body and spiritual practice.  As such, it will tend to bring us face-to-face with our own egoism, with our own contraction amid the larger flow of life.  Injury is one of the ways it does this, and it appears to be doing so for more and more people as its popularity increases.

Yoga can also bring about profound and rapid healing; but yogic alignment isn’t just about moving one’s bones around.  It is a practice of bringing mind, body, heart and Spirit into conscious and harmonious relationship.  For Type-A westerners like me, it may be difficult to remember that yoga is a practice, not an achievement.  This remembrance only becomes more challenging as yoga is increasingly seen as a path not just toward spiritual realization, but toward money, power and fame.

In December I had the honor of presenting a vision for transforming urban streets and neighborhoods through the use of green infrastructure–that is, infrastructure that uses natural systems like plants, soils and rainwater to provide a wide spectrum of services like shade, cooling, cleaning of air and water, and wildlife habitat.  In this talk at Tucson’s first TEDx event, I share some photos from my work with Watershed Management Group, where we are developing exciting and innovative community-based applications of green infrastructure.

As I make my way through the environmental world week to week, I see two competing visions of the future.  The first calls on us to grow, develop, and innovate a global economic and technological revolution that will bring us into a world of renewable energy; scientifically-managed industrial agriculture; and zero-waste, durable, and recyclable products and buildings.  The second approach asserts that we must re-localize everything, from farming and business to governance and energy production.  “Corporate social responsibility” versus “Local First” initiatives.  Bright Green versus Transition Towns.  Genetically engineered Golden Rice to feed the world versus backyard chickens to feed your family.  Massive solar and wind plants connected to mega-cities by thousands of miles of new transmission lines, versus solar panels on every rooftop.  Massive federal governments versus local control.

Interestingly, these two paths don’t neatly divide along political party lines, as Right-wing States’ rights activists and enthusiastic Lefty locavores may sometimes find themselves on the same side of an issue.  They divide more along people’s vision of the Good Life: a global world of opportunity and mobility, or a local world of community and human-scale systems.

Who’s right?  I haven’t the faintest.  But add to the mix a world where floods submerge an entire country, and drought and fires destroy a major nation’s wheat crop in the same year, and we have a high-stakes game that goes beyond identifying what we want, to what we think the Earth and its inhabitants can handle.

At one extreme, we have the blindly optimistic belief that we can sustainably bring all 6+ billion of us (and growing) up to the western standard of living through as-yet-undiscovered technology.  At the other end, we have the equally naïve  assumption that people in the developed world will willingly return en masse to a life of “meaningful” manual labor, low-tech craftsmanship and communal togetherness.

The good news is that in our better moments, many of us can transcend the false dichotomy presented by these narrow value systems.  From this perspective we can conceive of “both-and” approaches that respect our core values and on-the-ground realities at the same time, whether (and they are) the realities of global Capitalism or ecological limits.  Can we create a world that preserves the best of modern civilization while developing and preserving systems that support social and ecological integrity?  To do so, we’ll need hybrid solutions that go far beyond the Prius.  Could it be that we need backyard chickens and vertically-stacked urban aquaponic agricultural complexes?  Is there room in our world for broad-scale distributed solar and massive offshore wind farms?  Is a localized economy in a globally-integrated infrastructure an oxymoron?

More immediately, will we have a role in choosing the kind of future we want, or will nature decide for us?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 99 other followers